Discussion (7) ¬

1. 
   Bernhard

   March 3, 2015 at 5:32 am | # | Reply

   I love the alt text!
2. 
   Ray Dannelly

   March 3, 2015 at 8:49 pm | # | Reply

   I understand the motovation, but half an hour of discussion is truly a wildly short period of time. And I agree that turning everything into a vote instead of letting the discussion run its course isn’t going to end well.

   • 
     Nick Schneider

     March 4, 2015 at 5:41 am | # | Reply

     I actually remember when this was an issue with our con as well.

     Although we started emphasis on focus rather than calling for a vote every 30. We’ve had our fair share of meetings get a little too carried away with several discussions (So many times I forget), its just to the point where we’re older, we try to reign it in best we can and make sure to keep focus.

     Funny thing is, I was in Sarah’s shoes. But never ever took it that far. Brought it up to my friends outside of meetings and during meetings requested that we try to be a bit more organized when it came to discussions.

     You may laugh, but you do enough nudging over a long period of time and it takes seed in people’s mind.
3. 
   fourthirteen

   March 3, 2015 at 11:40 pm | # | Reply

   Should Sarah stop trying so hard to just get things done instead of talking it out? Or is the act of endless discussion detrimental to con business? I move that we vote on the topic.

   • 
     Awesome Roy

     March 4, 2015 at 12:03 am | # | Reply

     Seconded.
   • 
     xero

     March 5, 2015 at 2:27 am | # | Reply

     they spent 4 weeks debating changing something no one wanted changed so YEA i’m with her on this
4. 
   KORfan

   March 6, 2015 at 7:47 pm | # | Reply

   One time on the UW-Madison Student Senate I seconded everything.